All posts by DungeonMaster

Persistence of Myth

A few days back I wrote about the persistence of the belief that the United States of America is a “Christian Nation.”  The Fox News web site is running a story today about a group that is trying to block the inclusion of the phrase “In God We Trust” on  the Capital Visitor Center in Washington, DC.  The Freedom From Religion Foundation is suing on the basis that engraving these words on a publicly owned facilitate would “discriminate against those who do not practice religion and unfairly promote a Judeo-Christian perspective.”

The story then quotes two Republican members of Congress:

“This lawsuit is another attempt by liberal activists to rewrite history and deny that America’s Judeo-Christian heritage is an essential foundation stone of our great nation,” said Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa.

Rep. Daniel Lungren, R-Calif., said he was expecting a lawsuit but called the claims “patently absurd.”

Christianity has certainly played an important role in the history of our nation.  Many of our citizens claim to be Christian.  While both of those observations are true it does not follow that government must promote such beliefs on public facilities.  In fact, the Constitution specifically prohibits such promotion precisely because it would discriminate against those who do not share the same spiritual belief system or those who do not have a spiritual belief system.

I consider myself to be politically liberal and I don’t find that I’m the one trying to re-write history.  Quite the contrary.  I’m trying to show that people such as Rep. King and Rep. Lungren are actually the ones working to obscure the principles that actually established the system of law in the United States of America.

Browser Examples

Since I’ve started doing more web development over the last couple of years, I’ve become much more interested in how web sites appear in different browsers.  This page article is going to show how this web site, at least a small corner of it, appears in a different browsers on several operating systems.  This isn’t an exhaustive review of any of the browsers.  It’s really just to demonstrate the appearance of one web page in various browsers.

Camino

Camino (Mac OS X)
Camino (Mac OS X)

Chrome

Chrome (Mac OS X)
Chrome (Mac OS X)
Chrome (Windows XP)
Chrome (Windows XP)

Chrome on Mac OS X is still a beta, so it isn’t quite as robust as its Windows counterpart.

FireFox

FireFox (Mac OS X)
FireFox (Mac OS X)
FireFox (Windows XP)
FireFox (Windows XP)

I’ve been finding lately that the latest version of FireFox (3.5) on Windows takes a long time to load.  So long, in fact, that I often end up starting additional instance because I think that I somehow missed clicking on the icon.  Regardless of the slow load, it is hard to beat the Firebug plugin for buidling web sites.

Internet Explorer

Internet Explorer (Windows XP)
Internet Explorer (Windows XP)

I know that Internet Explorer 8 is supposed to bring all sorts of useful and cool enhancements, but I haven’t been able to figure out what they are or how they could make my web browsing exerience more satisfying.  The only thing that I’ve seen that is different is that IE8 locks up more frequently than IE7.  As always, IE 8 remains the favorite (read as: only) target for third-party application browser application toolbars.

Maxthon

Maxthon (Windows XP)
Maxthon (Windows XP)

Maxthon is a browser that I recently learned about.  My understanding is that it is quite popular in Asia, particularly China.  I don’t really like this browser.  You can’t really see if from this small screenshot, but the UI is, in my opinion, very busy.  If I’m going to work on web sites that could run in any browser, it is worthwhile to work with this one.

Opera

Opera (Windows XP)
Opera (Windows XP)

Safari

Safari (Mac OS X)
Safari (Mac OS X)
Safari (iPhone)
Safari (iPhone)
Safari (Windows XP)
Safari (Windows XP)

Conclusion

I find that my personal preference is trending towards Google Chrome on Windows (XP and Vista) and Mozilla Camino on Mac OS X.

General Motors – SOS (Same Old Stuff)

General Motors (GM) has, officially, emerged from bankruptcy protection (various articles announcing the “success” are here and here).  The truth is that no matter how much you cheerlead for GM or how many large government bailouts they receive, nothing has truly changed.  They’re still the same broken company with the same broken business model.  The only thing that has really changed is that the hard-working folks who build the cars that management thinks the average American consumer wants have had to make major concessions in terms of their union contracts.

Fox News says that the “new GM is now leaner, cleansed of massive debt and burdensome contracts that would have sunk it without federal loans.”  What they didn’t say is that the same management is still around.  They do not appear to be “cleansing” management levels or forcing contract concessions amongst executives.  Layoffs and concessions seem to be the domain of the hourly or salaried non-management employees.

The real problem with GM is that they haven’t made a product that I’m interested in purchasing.  I’d much rather purchase a well-made, reliable, fuel-efficient car from a company like Toyota that is willing to take risks and deliver the innovative vehicles that consumers really want.  I love the fact that I can get 500 miles on a tank of gas in my Prius and do it with mileage in the 45+ range.  If Toyota brought out a hydrogen or all-electric version of the Prius that could get the same range as my existing gasoline/electric hybrid, I would be at the dealership talking to sales about how I could purchase such a vehicle.  If they could do it in a truck, so much the better.

Come on GM, I just said what I’m interested in buying.  Are you up to the task of bringing such vehicles to the market in the US?

Sadly, I don’t think any one at GM has the imagination and willingness to risk necessary to build the vehicles that would persuade me to become a GM customer, to keep my vehicle-purchasing dollars in the US.

Myth of the “Christian Nation”

Many letter writers in the local newspaper, The Daily News, argue that the United States of America was founded as a “Christian Nation,” that is now a “Christian Nation,” and that it must remain a “Christian Nation.” The local writers aren’t the only ones making the argument; it appears in many newspapers, on television shows with Christian themes, and on numerous web sites. The topic of the “Christian Nation” of the USA is increasingly relevant in the modern world as many people in predominately Muslim countries see the policies and rhetoric of the USA towards them as the resurgence of the Crusades.

The argument that the United States of America is a “Christian Nation” generally proceeds from the claim that the Founding Fathers were Christians. Following from that is the observation that the Declaration of Independence contains the phrases “to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them” and “they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights” and that these, necessarily, establish that the United States of America was founded as a Christian nation [emphasis added in both quotations].

Neither the phrase “Nature’s God” nor the phrase “their Creator” specify the Christian god. “God,” in the western tradition, is often synonymous with the Christian god, though not exclusively. It can easily be used by adherents of any faith such as Christians, Jews, Muslims, Baha’is, and many others to refer to their deity. “Creator” is still more ambiguous and could be interpreted by some as the Universe itself as “their Creator.”

The Constitution, the founding and basic law of the United States of America, says only that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof” and then only in the First Amendment to the Constitution. This basic law prohibits Congress, and, by extension, state and local governments, from establishing a state religion. Government is also prohibited by the First Amendment from interfering with the religious faiths established by the citizens and the practice of those faiths. Government is to remain neutral on the subject of religion; it is to neither promote nor restrict the exercise of any particular faith nor is it to promote or restrict faiths in general.

The two documents that establish the legal basis for and the basic law of the United States of America say little about religion in the abstract and nothing whatsoever about the United States of America being founded as a “Christian Nation.”

The founders were wise to record nothing in these basic documents with respect to religion. They knew that just they had to compromise on many issues founding a new nation such as the structure of the government, the keeping of slaves, taxes, the rights of the states vs. the federal government, the role of the military, and the rights of the individual vs. the government that compromise and respect for people of all faiths, including those who did not express a faith, would be key to holding the nation of diverse beliefs together.

A quarter millennia ago the Founders were not far removed from the great religious wars of Europe. In fact, many of the Founders owed their presence in North America to to their parents and grandparents having fled religious persecution in Europe. We easily remember the Puritans, but there were many other Christian sects that felt that the freedom that North American offered was better than Europe.

Certainly, most Americans throughout history and today have self-identified as “Christian” whether they truly practice their version of the faith or not. America, perhaps more so than any other nation, has large minority populations practicing other faiths. This is a good thing; it brings strength through diversity of thought guided by varying religious principles. This is particularly true when members of different faiths are willing to compromise due to the sound ideas of others.

A major point of debate is whether or not some people who claim to be members of the Body of Christ actually are. Catholics are commonly accused of “not being Christians.” The reasoning for this accusation is beyond the scope of this discussion. If Catholics were eliminated from the numbers of self-identified Christians, it would bring the percentage of Christians in the USA down to a bare majority. According to the American Religious Identification Survey (ARIS) 2008, 76.7% of Americans are Christian (the survey is summarized here). If Catholics are removed from this number then the percentage of Americans self-identified as Christian falls to 50.9%. Other denominations are also often accused of “not being Christian.”

Unlike some nations, Americans are not required to state a religious faith to the government and be bound by that statement of faith. (Egypt is an example where religious registration is mandatory.) Consider too that because no official registration of faith is required that Americans are free to change religion at will as their own spiritual journey dictates. In some locations, particularly in Muslim areas that implement Sharia Law, it is impossible to openly change one’s faith; to do so is to invite a formal death sentence from the government or from the religious authority or to be tried and executed by local vigilantes.

The Founders did not establish a state religion or laws that allowed the state intervene in religious affairs because they feared the tyranny, repression, and violence it could propagate. Their bequest of religious freedom enables us to undertake a national spiritual journey in much the same way as individuals. We may some day become a nation of Muslims, Buddhists, Baha’is, atheists, or, even, agnostics. And that is what we truly are: a Nation of Freedom.

What Happened to the SciFi Channel?

I know the SciFi Channel has re-branded itself as “Syfy“.  The tagline says that we’re suppossed to “imagine greater.”  I’m having a difficult time imagining how the change could be worse.

For example, tonight I have quite a bit of free time; my wife is out of the house at a meeting for several hours.  I figured it would be a good time to turn on SciFi Syfy and watch some shows I don’t get to see that often, maybe catch something new.  Instead, I was greeted with Ghost Hunters: International.  The guide showed nothing but Ghost Hunters: International for the remainder of the evening.  So much for watching some good scifi (note the difference in spelling).  Instead, I’m spending it reminiscing about scifi and writing this posting.

But a whole day of Ghost Hunters:  International?  Is the amount of available science fiction material that limited that the network that has brought science fiction to cable television for so many years has to resort to a show about ghosts?  And a bad one at that?   (Yes, I have watched various incarnations of Ghost Hunters and they’re all bad and not believable or entertaining in the least.  In fact, I have serious doubts about whether or not the show is “real.”)

I find it difficult to believe that good science fiction is hard to come by.  The old SciFi Channel just finished out a phenomenal re-telling of Battlestar Galactica, for example.  Even if Syfy resorted to re-running Star Trek, they could fill at least 700 consecutive hours of programming (about 30 days) with good stories.  There are many other good scifi television series such as Dr. Who, Babylon 5, Farscape, Twilight Zone, Firefly, Eureka, The X-Files, and the Stargate franchise that could be shown.  There are also many, many movies including the major scifi (and fantasy) franchises such as Star Trek, Star Wars, The Lord of the Rings, and Indiana Jones as well as their attendant documentaries plus all of the countless other scifi (and fantasy) films to numerous to mention that could be shown.

My wife and I did catch Syfy’s new series, Warehouse 13, last night.  It was mildly entertaining.  We’ll probably watch the next couple of episodes to see if it catches our interest.  Caprica is coming too, but it just doesn’t look like it has enough to catch my attention.  Besides, those series that go back and try to tell the ancient backstory of phenomenally successful series just aren’t that successful themselves.

If SciFi Syfy actually showed science fiction and fantasy programming, I would be watching it.  I’d be watching it right now.

Syfy says that with the change in branding they can do “much more” with television, the web, games, mobile media, and what not.  The only thing I want more of is scifi.

iPhone Image Formats

What is the iPhone image file format? When I work with the files that are on the phone I see some that are in jpg and png format. I understand the difference between the file formats. I’m just curiuous about when the iPhone creates which.

Fox News Funnies – #9

While browsing the Fox News web site, they once again tried to serve up a virus through one of their “carefully selected partners.”  Fortunately, Google Chrome caught the attempted infection.

Fox Tries to Infect (Again)
Fox Tries to Infect (Again)

Computer Backups

I’ve learned a painful lesson about computer backups.  In the last two days I’ve lost two hard disks.  One had two movie projects representing hundreds if not thousands of hours of work; the other contained college project work, personal pictures, and a large music collection.

Most, if not all, of the information on the first was also stored on a laptop.  The actual loss in this case shoudn’t be much.

The other failure is more problematic as little if any of the material was stored in other places.  My usual processes of placing a laptop disk in a USB enclosure failed.  Windows XP wouldn’t recognize the disk; Windows Vista helpfully offered to format it; Mac OS X showed that there was about 60 gig of data on it, but wouldn’t let me access it; and an Ubuntu live CD identified that the disk needed to be attached to a Windows system and run chkdks /f on the disk. It looks like a disk recovery service is the only option at this stage. The pricing of the services isn’t attractive considering they may not be able to get anything anyway.

So what have I learned?  Two things.  First, I’ve learned that I need to come up with an effective backup strategy for the computers that I’m responsible for outside of work. Right now that’s seven systems and two NAS devices. I’m a software developer and I really should know better.  I wouldn’t settle for not having a backup plan at work.  No crises and always being successful in previous disk failures at getting most, if not everything, from failed disks has bred complacency.

Second, I need to teach the kids to back up their important materials in multiple locations.  That’s probably the harder task.

iPhone Features – #2

One of the features of the new iPhone 3 OS that I discovered quite by accident is the ability to “undo” typing.  Just give the phone a quick shake when you’ve typed something you don’t want.  The “Undo Typing” dialog will slide onto the screen.

Undo Typing
Undo Typing

If you happen to shake the phone when there is nothing to undo then the “Nothing to Undo” dialog will slide onto the screen.

Nothing to Undo
Nothing to Undo

This handy feature isn’t available everywhere in the phone.  For example, the keypad used for actually dialing telephone numbers does not support undo.

iPhone Features

I discovered a feature of the iPhone accidentally today. When a text message fails to send the iPhone helfully displays a warning sign next to the text message.

Text Sending Error
Text Sending Error

Clicking the exclamation icon brings up a handy dialog to ask if I want to send it again.

Try Again?
Try Again?

I don’t recall having seen this feature before, so it might be new with the iPhone 3 OS release.